Mehedi Hasan · Senior Software Engineer Wolverine Solution Pricing: Fixed-Scope Sprints, Builds, and the $12k Portal
See Wolverine Solution pricing: sprints, fixed-scope builds, or embedded seniors. Order portals start at $12k for 5-50 locations.
What does Wolverine Solution pricing include?
Wolverine Solution pricing covers three commercial shapes: fixed-price sprints, fixed-scope builds, and embedded senior talent. You get a statement of work with milestones, a change-control rule, and weekly demos. The published anchor is a wholesale order portal from $12k, delivered in 8–12 weeks for 5–50 locations. Other builds use that same SOW and the same change-control rule.
We are a Montréal studio. Buyers sit in the US and the EU: regional wholesale distributors, local multi-location operators, and technical seed-stage founders who want a fixed outcome. People comparing a Razer controller, a peptide stack, or a simulation license are in a different market that shares the Wolverine name.
A typical SOW names the stack up front. Web work is React and Next.js. Mobile work is React Native or native iOS and Android. AI work is a RAG pipeline, an agentic workflow, or an eval harness around an LLM. Fine-tuning is a separate line when the data justifies it. Cloud work is Terraform on AWS or GCP. When the founder has no head of product yet, UI/UX design and embedded product leadership sit in the same contract.
Wholesale buyers usually already run NetSuite or Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central. The portal or field app calls that ERP. The ERP stays the ledger. Draw that line and a five-figure build stays a five-figure build, instead of turning into an enterprise systems-integration program.
How do fixed-price sprints, fixed-scope builds, and embedded senior talent differ?
A fixed-price sprint buys one pre-scoped slice and a demo. A fixed-scope build locks a portal, field app, or RAG system to acceptance tests before coding starts. Embedded senior talent places a lead in your team for a bounded window. All three close on a written scope and a fixed invoice.
| Way to work | What you are buying | Best fit | What is public |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed-price sprint | One outcome, one demo, a written stop | Prove a workflow before a larger SOW | Quoted per sprint after discovery |
| Fixed-scope build | Deliverables, date, and acceptance tests | Portal, dashboard, mobile app, or RAG bot you will own | Order portal from $12k, 8–12 weeks, 5–50 locations |
| Embedded senior talent | A named senior inside your rituals for a bounded window | Seed team that needs product judgment, then a build | Quoted engagement with a written stop date |
Staff-augmentation shops such as Brocoders and Very Creatives are often compared on monthly seat cost. The question our buyers ask is different: who owns the Git repo, who accepts the tests, and what a new screen costs after signature. questions a technical founder should ask before hiring a fixed-scope agency
Sprints exist so we price from a cut list. A founder who wants a PostgreSQL-backed SaaS dashboard, and has not chosen the MVP screens, buys a sprint that ends in a clickable scope and a build price. Continue, and the sprint fee is credited toward that build. Either way, you keep the notes.
How much does a multi-location order portal cost?
A fixed-price multi-location order portal from Wolverine Solution starts at $12,000 and ships in 8–12 weeks for operators running 5–50 locations. The price assumes one ERP as the system of record, buyer login, order status, and location-aware pricing. Punchout, per-customer price lists, and offline exceptions are written as their own line items.
The $12k portal is the published starting price on the pricing and portal pages. Dashboards, React Native apps, and RAG systems are quoted in a SOW after scoping. No public rate card for those shapes. The invoice has to match the acceptance tests.
What the portal starting price is meant to cover:
- Buyer accounts tied to a sold-to and ship-to
- Order status and reorder against the ERP, across branches
- One price view the buyer is allowed to see
- Handoff of the repo and a short admin path your staff can run
What moves the same portal off the starting price:
- NetSuite or Business Central objects that differ from a standard sales order
- Punchout or cXML for a large retail customer
- Contract pricing that differs by customer, branch, and unit of measure
- A second language, or an EU data-residency rule for the app and its logs
Distributors weighing an AppSource add-on against a custom portal should compare pricing, punchout, and order status before they fund a rewrite. Business Central customer portal options
What raises or lowers the price of a web, mobile, or AI build?
Price moves with integrations, offline behavior, and proof. A React or Next.js dashboard on PostgreSQL with one auth model stays tighter than a React Native app that must sync offline orders to NetSuite or Business Central. A RAG support bot adds a golden-set eval harness. Each item is its own line and acceptance test in the SOW.
Use this as a planning list. It is a scope checklist. It becomes a second price sheet only after discovery writes the numbers.
Keeps the SOW smaller
- One system of record, already in production
- Roles you can name on a whiteboard: buyer, branch manager, finance
- Online-only users on current iOS and Android versions
- Documents you already trust as the source for a RAG bot
Shows up as extra lines before you sign
- Offline capture for reps in a warehouse or on a route, plus a conflict rule when two people edit the same order
- Customer-specific price lists exported from the ERP on a schedule
- Eval gates for a B2B support bot: citation-required rate, refusal cases, and a weekly re-run budget
- EU AI Act logging, residency, and a named human-oversight step on a seed-stage support bot
- A Terraform landing zone on AWS or GCP when the account structure is still missing
A wolverine app query often surfaces games and VPN lookalikes. For a field app, the price sits in the offline rule and the ERP sync. A wolverine software query collides with simulation tools and hardware. The offer on this site is custom code your team owns after handoff.
The default AI price is RAG plus evals. Fine-tuning becomes a SOW line after label cost and hallucination risk are written down. That choice changes the invoice and the weekly ops burden.
How does change control keep a Wolverine Solution price fixed?
Change control means new behavior is a written change request with a price and a date impact before anyone builds it. Bugs against the acceptance tests stay inside the signed price. New screens, new ERP objects, and new roles wait for that change request. You see the cut list in discovery, so the fixed price stays auditable.
The weekly rhythm is ordinary agile inside a locked scope. Sprint Planning confirms the next tests. A short stand-up surfaces blockers. Sprint Review demos working software against the SOW. A new idea from the review goes on the change log. It waits there until you accept the price and the date.
You should have these artifacts before the first build invoice:
- A scope list with in-scope and out-of-scope columns
- Acceptance tests a non-developer can run
- Milestone dates tied to those tests
- A named owner on your side for ERP access, sample data, and sign-off
- Repo ownership in your GitHub or GitLab org, and cloud accounts in your name
Discovery is paid. Continue into the build and that fee is credited. Stop, and you keep the notes, the test list, and the price.
Who is Wolverine Solution pricing built for?
Wolverine Solution pricing fits a distributor, a multi-location operator, or a seed-stage founder who can name the outcome: a portal, an internal tool, a field app, or an AI assistant with tests. It fits a team that will own the repo and the cloud account when the SOW ends. Large systems-integrator programs sit outside this menu.
Buyers who match:
- A distributor replacing email-and-spreadsheet orders across a handful of branches
- A multi-location operator whose SOPs live in shared drives and drift by site
- A technical founder who wants a senior for one product decision, then a build they can fund
Queries we already see near this brand, and how this page treats them:
- Wolverine software and wolverine app: use the services table above, then the mobile or portal SOW
- Hardware and career queries (wolverine pc, product-designer job posts): different sites; this page prices custom builds
FAQ
Buyers searching Wolverine Solution pricing usually ask five things: brand mix-ups, hourly overages, what $12k includes, whether a sprint is enough, and who owns the repo and the cloud account. The answers below match the SOW rules on the pricing page.
Is Wolverine Solution the same as Razer Wolverine or Wolverine software?
Wolverine Solution (wolverinesolution.com, Montréal) prices custom web, mobile, and AI systems under a fixed-scope SOW for US and EU operators. Razer Wolverine is a game controller. Other “Wolverine software” brands sell simulation tools or unrelated products. If the invoice you want is for a portal, a React Native field app, or a RAG bot, this is the studio and the price model.
Do you switch to hourly billing after the SOW is signed?
The signed scope stays fixed. Defects against acceptance tests are corrected inside that price. A new workflow, a new ERP record type, or a new role is a change request with its own price and schedule. You approve it before we build it. That written rule is how the pricing page’s “no surprise invoices” line is enforced on a live project.
What is included in the $12k order portal?
The published starting price covers a wholesale order portal for 5–50 locations, delivered in 8–12 weeks: buyer login, order status, and location-aware pricing against one ERP. It is a portal on top of NetSuite or Business Central, and it leaves the ERP implementation itself alone. Punchout, complex contract pricing, and extra systems are added as written line items. Confirm the live inclusion list on the portal page before you book.
Can a seed-stage founder start with a sprint instead of a full build?
A fixed-price sprint is the right first purchase when the MVP cut is still soft: which screens exist, which role is out of scope, which metric the demo must move. The sprint ends with a scope, acceptance tests, and a build price. Proceed, and the sprint fee is credited. Stop, and you still leave with a document another team could estimate.
Who owns the repository and the cloud account?
You do. Code lands in your GitHub or GitLab organization. AWS or GCP accounts, and the Terraform state that describes them, sit under your billing and your admin users. Our access lasts only as long as the SOW says we operate the environment. Handoff includes the pipeline, the runbook, and the acceptance tests, so a later hire starts from your org.
What should you do next if these shapes match the build?
Book a scoping call with the ERP, the field constraint, or the MVP cut list in hand. You leave with a SOW outline: in-scope, out-of-scope, acceptance tests, and a fixed price. Portal work starts from the published $12k, 8–12 week offer. Name a React Native field app or a RAG bot on the form.
Bring one decision-maker who can grant ERP access and sign the cut list. We work with regional distributors, multi-location operators, and seed-stage founders in the US and EU. The scope stays locked after signature, and the next invoice follows the change log.
Need this built? Our team does fixed-scope fixed-price portal build — scoped, priced and delivered in weeks.